Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
ESTATE OF SHIRLEE MONDAY et al v. RED RIVER TALC LLC et al
as 3:2026cv03930
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF SHIRLEE MONDAY and CARL MONDAY
Defendant:
RED RIVER TALC LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis First Monday, Inc. v. City of Canton, Texas
as 6:2026cv00124
Plaintiff:
Lewis First Monday, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Canton, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Darnell Monday v. State of California
as 2:2026cv04268
Petitioner:
Darnell Monday
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LS IV et al v. Cumberland County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv00021
Plaintiff:
LS IV and Laurence Malcolm Smith, III
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Tennessee, Casey Cox, Dustin Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Mix et al
as 1:2026cv00850
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Ellis
Defendant:
Misty Zade, Lacy Monday, Rick Grooms and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Mark S. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viet (PS) v. Zade et al
as 1:2026cv00027
Defendant:
Misty Zade, Buchannan, Jane Gilden and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Viet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyundai Motor Company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv14567
Plaintiff:
Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Aoocar, BIN DUO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
