Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roland Mathis v. Joel Ziegler
as 20-7478
Defendant / Appellee:
P. A. ELLIS, RDAP MR. CARNELL, DR. EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
P. A. HUTCHISON, OFFICER JAMES, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
Mayfield v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Other Medical Personels Unknown, Nurse Mr. Rose, Warden Young and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Rose et al
as 3:2019cv00667
Plaintiff:
Donald Nelson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Central Intelligence Agency, Centerstone Half-Way House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Ballard et al
as 2:2019cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Woods
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, David Ballard, Mr. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Burkhart et al
as 1:2019cv00593
Defendant:
Karen Stantford, Ms. Burkhart, Richland Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Ziegler et al
as 5:2018cv01111
Defendant:
D. L. Young, Joel Ziegler, Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Columbia Regional Care Center
as 8:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
James M Howard
Defendant:
Rec Officer Chance, Mr Rose and Mr Larins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Walters et al
as 8:2015cv02179
Plaintiff:
James M Howard
Defendant:
Walters, Mr Rose and Dana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. F.C.I. Beckley Med. Staff Employees et al
as 5:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Steve Jones
Defendant:
F.C.I. Beckley Med. Staff Employees, Mr. White, Mrs. Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
