Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Cleveland et al v. Tucker et al
as 4:2023cv05312
Plaintiff:
Ivan V. Cleveland and Deveron Ratliff
Defendant:
Mr. Tucker, Mr. Gash, Mr, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Panni et al
as 0:2023cv60870
Defendant:
Mr. Adam Paul Panni and Caryll-Ann Schenker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Panni v. Schenker
as 0:2023cv60872
Plaintiff:
Mr. Adam Paul Panni
Defendant:
Caryllann Schenker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Steele v. FCI Hazelton Medical Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lacosta Steele
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Medical Staff, Mr Boach, Mrs Resh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wooten v. FCI Petersburg Medium et al
as 1:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Ronald T. Wooten
Defendant:
FCI Petersburg Medium, C/O Mr. Adams, Warden/ Designee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moser v. Adams
as 5:2021cv00195
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
Mr. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
EDWARDS v. LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv13076
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY, CHIEF LT. HELESTON, MR. ADAM ERICCO and others
Plaintiff:
MR. RENE DALLAS EDWARDS and RENE DALLAS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
