Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mesyats v. Prosecutor's Office of Austria et al
as 1:2015cv06604
Plaintiff:
Anatoly Vladimirovich Mesyats
Defendant:
Prosecutor's Office of Austria, General Prokurator of Austria, Dr. Werner Pleischl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC v. RICHEY et al
as 1:2013cv02006
Defendant:
ARGENT MORTGAGE, CO., LLC, MICHAEL A. BENEDICT, CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Vazquez-Rivera v. Figueroa, et al
as 12-2439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL A. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGDA FIGUEROA, as Executive Officer, U. S. Army Garrison Fort Buchanan, NANNETTE LOPEZ-SILVA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, represented by the Attorney General Mr. Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
A073-5097-775:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
A077-022-352:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PROPHET-ABDUL HAKIYM JOAQUIN FOY EL-MEHDI, ET AL. v. PROPHET-JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY-AKA-AL-MAHDI et al
as 2:2010cv04052
Petitioner:
PROPHET-ABDUL HAKIYM JOAQUIN FOY EL-MEHDI, ET AL.
Respondent:
PROPHET-JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY-AKA-AL-MAHDI, HON.WARDEN-MARTY C. ANDERSON, HIS PSYCHE STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gelish v. U.S.A. et al
as 2:2010cv03636
Defendant:
Mr. Barack B'bama, Mr. Joseph Bianco, Mr. Joseph Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Gelish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
