Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Risie Howard v. Hormel Foods Corporation
as 24-1298
Plaintiff:
Risie Howard, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mrs. George Howard, Jr.
Defendant:
Hormel Foods Corporation, Jim Snee, Chairman of the Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
Mr. George Jackson
Defendant:
Walowski Ursula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steen v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mr. George Michael Steen
Respondent:
Todd Ishee and Brett Bullis
Defendant:
Warden Brett Bullis
Petitioner:
George Michael Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04541
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, 3M Company Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Justan Fleming, Breanna McGuire, Marlene Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sharp v. United Van Lines, LLC
as 9:2022cv81771
Plaintiff:
Mr. George Sharp
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Abraham Cruz v. Torrence State Hospital, et al
as 22-2668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
TORRENCE STATE HOSPITAL, DIRECTOR, DAVID R. CASHMAN and others
VELEZ v. velez et al
as 5:2021cv08822
Plaintiff:
Mr Alvaro G VELEZ
Defendant:
teresa a velez and Mr George M Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
***CASE ABANDONED SEE 3:21-5089-CV-SW-SRB OPENED IN ERROR*** v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv05088
Defendant:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Mr. George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
