Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Reeves v. Hatcher et al
as 4:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reeves
Defendant:
Shay Hatcher, Mr. Perry, Mr. Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Hatcher et al
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reeves
Defendant:
Shay Hatcher, Mr. Perry, Mr. Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIZZELL v. KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS et al
as 3:2023cv21050
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LEE BIZZELL
Defendant:
KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS, MR PERRY, B DYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Mr. Burzinski et al
as 8:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Mr. Burzinski, Mr. Kimbrell, Mr. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORREA-MARTINEZ v NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2021cv10599
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON, MR. PERRY, OFFICER UMANA and others
Plaintiff:
OSUALDO CORREA-MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv19964
Defendant:
MR. STEPHEN J LUCZO, MR. HUTHAM S OLAYAN, MR. JOSEPH MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06203
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE, MR. JOSEPH MILLER, MR. ROBERT H. HERZ and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00527
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage, Mr. Joseph Miller, Mr. Robert H. Herz and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis Moorer v. Mr. Luthi
as 19-1628
Defendant / Appellee:
MOSS & ASSOCIATES, CHRISTOPHER S. EDWARDS, NEW CAROLINA MORTGAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS GLENN MOORER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
