Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Burl Cain, Lieutenant Wten, Mr. Reynolds and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Wallens Ridge et al
as 7:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge, Red Onion, River North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds et al v. GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82087
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jess Reynolds and Mrs. Reynolds
Defendant:
GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC, Pfizer Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim Parmaceuticals, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Scott
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Melvin Davis and B. J. Ravizee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Mr. Reynold Smith and Renold Smith
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Charles Gary Wainwright
Defendant:
Mayor Latoya Cantrell, Officer Neil Carter, Neil Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00634
Defendant:
Officer Doe #5, Lt. Booker, V. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Farley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Curry et al
as 6:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Talawrence T. Vickers
Defendant:
Derrick McKinney, Mr. Reynolds and Angelyn Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Fleming
as 16-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FLEMING, ASSISTANT WARDEN COMBS, SGT. COLLINS and others
Royal Pollard v. Mr. Reynold
as 16-6318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYAL POLLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. REYNOLDS, Major/Supervisor, MR. SAPP, R.R.J. Officer, LARON DELOATCH, R.R.J. Officer and others
Pollard v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Royal Pollard
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Sapp, Mr. LaRon Deloatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
