Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Weir v. The City University of New York et al
as 2:2017cv04836
Defendant:
Mr. Edward Curtis, Frederick P Schaffer, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Weir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teresa Miller v. WVDOC
as 17-6463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a/k/a WVDOC, COMMISSIONER JIM RUBENSTEIN, WARDEN LAURA LORI NOHE and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, MR. MEED, MR. MEEK and others
Shadeed et al v. Green et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andre Smoot Shadeed, Edward J. Walker, Jr., Muwakkil S. Shabazz and others
Defendant:
T. Green, Lt. Wright, M. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. AUS, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03909
Defendant:
AUS, Inc., AUS2, Inc., 8201 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brandon X.K. Ware
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas Jones v. Corizon, et al
as 15-14003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, Medical Service Provider, JEAN DARBOUZE, Dr., MS. WILSON, Director of Nursing and others
Edward Rasberry v. The State of California
as 2:2015cv05555
Petitioner:
Mr Edward Rasberry
Respondent:
The State of California
EDWARDS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
RICHARD YOUNG, PATTIE GORGAN, BEST BUY ROOFING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2014cv02235
Plaintiff:
JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
RICHAERD YOUNG, PATTIE GORGAN, BEST BUY ROOFING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Pearson v. R. Crenshaw
as 13-6895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MR. EDWARD PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. CRENSHAW, Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
