Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. Seville et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Locklear, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Reed, Ms. Darby, Mr. Seville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Damien H. Richardson
Defendant:
Mr. Reed, Mrs. Meade and Mr. R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Hestheaven et al
as 2:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Mend Medical, Heske, John C. Hanrahn and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Wells, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Hestheaven et al
as 1:2020cv05738
Defendant:
Mend Medical, Racine County Jail, Hestheaven and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butcher et al
as 3:2020cv00917
Respondent:
M Butcher, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Mr Depecn and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish v. United States Of America(FTCA) et al
as 3:2019cv50327
Defendant:
United States Of America(FTCA), Mrs. McDowell, Mrs. Chipwood and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Bernsen et al
as 4:2017cv01320
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Leon Watkins
Defendant:
Herbert L. Bernsen, Tena V. Johnson, Gerald Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gregory, Jr. v. Dr. L. Levin
as 17-6407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES GREGORY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. L. LEVIN, Doctor, Haynesville Correctional Center and ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden
Defendant:
CHARLES ALLEN, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
