Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Glenn v. Ruffin et al
as 6:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Glenn
Defendant:
Adam Sinclair Ruffin, Michael Henthorne, Ms Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Morris, III v. Ms. Barber et al
as 1:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Ms. Barber and Superintendent, Mr. Hudson
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Morris, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Ms. Barber et al
as 1:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Gerald Watkins
Defendant:
Ms. Barber and Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT, MS. BARBER, MS. HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frierson v. Hazel et al
as 5:2013cv02530
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Frierson
Defendant:
Ms Hazel, C Hamilton, Mr Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Fogle et al
as 6:2013cv01670
Plaintiff:
Clarence Scott Miller
Defendant:
Ms Fogle, Ms Barber and John H Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Spears v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv03175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Maue et al
as 3:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dupree
Defendant:
Major Maue, C/O Niepert, Joe Harper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sherley v. Jefferson County Government et al
as 3:2007cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sherley
Defendant:
Jefferson County Government, Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
