Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Muhammad v. USA
as 4:2024cv02262
Petitioner:
Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mace v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Breanna D. Mace
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Cassie Jackson, John Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant:
DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
Cunningham v. USA
as 5:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Charles Muhammad Cunningham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al v. The Cable Internet Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast Corporation
Defendant:
The Cable Internet Services, LLC, KY Solutions, LLC, Cableandwirelessservices.com LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Muhammad v. Florence County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 5:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Muhammad, Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Florence County Sheriff's Dept, Florence County Detention Ctr and Ofc Ms McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Rasheed Muhammad
as 24-4130
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RASHEED ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD, a/k/a James Lee Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
