Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America Inc.
as 21-2029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN BOWEN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, JAMES GATTO, MERL CODE and others
Brian Bowen v. Adidas America Inc
as 21-1764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN BOWEN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, JAMES GATTO, MERL CODE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03669
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Munish Munish v. William Barr
as 19-70665
Petitioner:
MUNISH MUNISH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Glen Orange Mart et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv04176
Plaintiff:
Munish Gupta, Aradhna Gupta and Glen Orange Mart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601
Bowen v. Adidas America Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03118
Defendant:
Thomas Gassnola, James Gatto, Adidas America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bowen, II
Interested Party:
Dan Cutler
Cross Defendant:
Brian Bowen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chadha et al v. Tech Matrix Infosolutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03739
Defendant:
Santusht Bhatia, Cerno Technologies, Inc., Sanjay Chadha and others
Plaintiff:
Cerno Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Munish Chadha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
KASSAB et al v. JOHN et al
as 2:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
ADAM C. KASSAB , YECHIEL PETER SCHWARTZ , THOMAS WHEELER and others
Defendant:
FRANCIS D. JOHN , THEODORE B. BAUM , PETER HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Oakley, Inc. v. Yiyi, et al
as 1:2015cv05963
Defendant:
Tehmina, Davis, Tentxung Youxian Gongsi and others
Plaintiff:
Chhavi, Patel, Mary and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
