Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Goss v. Brace Express et al
as 5:2026cv04985
Plaintiff:
Jerry Goss
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Brace Express and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cotton v. Banks et al
as 1:2026cv02003
Plaintiff:
Rakeish Cotton
Defendant:
C. Banks, K. Eckenrod, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. United States of America
as 0:2026cv61925
Plaintiff:
Antwan Goss
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blamahsah v. Marceno et al
as 2:2026cv02166
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Blamahsah
Defendant:
Carmine Marceno, John Holloway, Abbi Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrahim Fata v. Edwin Arcelly, et al
as 26-2661
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
EDWIN ARCELLY, BOB KRASLEY, TRACEY KESTER and others
GOSS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv07610
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE GOSS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CARTER v. NICOLAS
as 3:2026cv04126
Plaintiff:
GERALD JAMES CARTER
Defendant:
C NICOLAS, K PERKINS, Z SCRUGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. City Of Roanoke et al
as 7:2026cv00461
Plaintiff:
Adeira Celeene Wright
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Virginia, Jane R. Conlin, Lynette L. Jobe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goss v. Pettit
as 6:2026cv02251
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Antonio Goss
Defendant:
Joshua A Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
