Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Faulkner v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 25-6672
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JOSEPH FAULKNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CHAD BLANCO, BERNART and others
Ackerman et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11539
Plaintiff:
Timothhy Ackerman, James Adams, Robin Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Faulkner v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 25-3938
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JOSEPH FAULKNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CHAD BLANCO, individual, SHANNON FLAKES and others
Hutchins v. Nanez
as 9:2025cv00178
Plaintiff:
Brian Hutchins
Defendant:
Roy Nanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nanez v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.
as 4:2025cv02401
Defendant:
Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Nanez doing business as Rosario's Mystic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NANEZ v. ALLERGAN INC. et al
as 2:2025cv00921
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NANEZ
Defendant:
ALLERGAN INC. and ALLERGAN USA INC.
Unknown:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025at00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ARMOUR et al v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2024cv10387
Plaintiff:
LAURIE GILMER, GINGER COWAN, NOAH GORDON and others
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
