Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Norman v. Arnold et al
as 3:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Norman
Defendant:
Dr. Don Arnold and Dr. Ann Elizabeth Hardy-Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11530
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WAYNE BUTLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Weaver
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Silbernagel v. Westfield Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Silbernagel
Defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Nathan Danner v. John Doe I, et al
as 22-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer John Doe, I, Corrections Officer, John Doe 2, Corrections Officer and John Doe 3, Corrrections Officer
PENCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07081
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WAYNE PENCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Weaver
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
