Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell et al v. Welcher et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Major Boyles, Captain B. Ervin and others
Plaintiff:
Taurus Myers, Dominique Daniels, Vodie Nathaniel Bell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. TSA Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03303
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bell
Defendant:
TSA Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BELL v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2014cv03406
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL BELL
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, DAVE BRYNE, NATALIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell (ID 78997) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2014cv03056
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Bell
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Delgado et al
as 3:2012cv50373
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nathaniel Bell
Defendant:
Delgado, Lolli and Mary Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Johnson et al
as 3:2008cv00578
Plaintiff:
Edward Nathaniel Bell
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Loretta K. Kelly and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Berry et al
as 3:2008cv00317
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Earl Wesley Berry, Kevin Green, Derrick Sonnier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell et al v. J C Penney Corp Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
Oletha Bell and Nathaniel Bell, Jr
Defendant:
J C Penney Corp Inc, J C Penney Corp Inc, A I G Insurance Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilkerson et al v. Loop's Nursery & Greenhouses, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Donald Wilkerson, Nathaniel Bell, Andrew King and others
Defendant:
Loop's Nursery & Greenhouses, Inc. and Ronald Uzzle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Bell v. Kelly
as 06-22
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD NATHANIEL BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
