Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FRAZIER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06450
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frazier v. Lumpkin
as 22-10270
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathaniel Frazier
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
FRAZIER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85769
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2019cv00064
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Nathaniel Frazier
as 16-14540
Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frazier v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv03263
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Frazier, Jr
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv02290
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden, Octavius Wilfork, Christopher Powers and others
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 4:2010cv01437
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Frazier
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
FRAZIER v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Defendant:
MARILYN S. BROOKS, PETER LONGSTREET, CURRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2007cv02710
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL FRAZIER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
