Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor and Ezekiel Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Indiana, Indiana Department Of Corrections/MCF and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Sabrina's Trucking LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
Michael Sylvester
Defendant:
Sabrina's Trucking LLC, Sabrina Johnson and Nathaniel Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07394
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03497
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Chabre Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Mr. Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden McKendley Newton, Mr. Alan M. Wilson and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Nathaniel Boychief
as 21-30231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON BOYCHIEF
USA v. Nathaniel Boychief
as 21-30227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON BOYCHIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
