Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Peterkin v. Virola
as 1:2026cv04725
Plaintiff:
Lasa-Kaye A Peterkin
Defendant:
Dediego Negron Virola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Hernandez v. Negron-Natal et al
as 3:2026cv01499
Plaintiff:
AIDA HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
BETZAIDA NEGRON-NATAL, Airbnb, Inc. and Municipality Toa Baja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04561
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Negron et al v. Bonner et al
as 1:2026cv13159
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Charlene Bonner, Angelo Gomez Jr., Suzan Colletet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Reilly v. The Knot Worldwide, Inc., et al
as 1:2026cv05369
Plaintiff:
JULIET O'REILLY
Defendant:
THE KNOT WORLDWIDE INC., ALISSA UMANSKY, CHLOE NEGRON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stanley v. Kim
as 3:2026cv01646
Plaintiff:
Taquan Stanley
Defendant:
Sgt. Negron and Nurse Ms. Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv06911
Plaintiff:
Gladys Negron
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blann v. Chesapeake Waste Industries, LLC
as 1:2026cv02253
Plaintiff:
Bryan Blann, Dallas Brooks, Tyron Edmonds and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Waste Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
