Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SHIELDS v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SHIELDS , JR.
Defendant:
NEIL GODFREY, CONWAY, MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ex Parte Application of Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
as 1:2016mc00185
Petitioner:
Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Respondent:
Stephen M. Sakoman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: Ex Parte Application of Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
as 1:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re Ex Parte Application of Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
as 5:2016mc80073
Movant:
In re Ex Parte Application of Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2016mc91016
Petitioner:
Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Thirdparty_defendant:
Ray Ozzie
In Re: Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
as 1:2015mc01142
Defendant:
Dell, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Godfrey and Pro-Sys Consultants
In Re:
Letter Rogatory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re Ex Parte Application of Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
as 3:2015mc80304
Petitioner:
Pro-Sys Consultants and Neil Godfrey
Miscellaneou:
Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEWART v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KENNETH STEWART
Defendant:
NEIL GODFREY, C. D. RITTER, J. CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2015cv00676
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. STEWART
Defendant:
NEIL GODFREY, DAVID J. KILARSKI and LANE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLADE v. MONROE et al
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
PARRISH NATHANIEL SLADE
Defendant:
TIM MONROE , NEIL GODFREY , MOORE COUNTY JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
