Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Hill v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00982
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hill
Defendant:
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camick v. Wattley, et al
as 17-3004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LYLE CAMICK, AKA Wayne Camick
Defendant - Appellee:
EVELYN A. WATTLEY, KAITRAXX, LLC, DISTRICT COURT OF COWLEY COUNTY, KANSAS and others
Hill v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv02387
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
CAMICK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv08844
Plaintiff:
LESLIE LYLE CAMICK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH, LINDA LOOMIS, NICOLE HILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford et al v. Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc. , NoMoreClipboard, LLC , Rory Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Advanced Data Processing, Inc. v. Nicole Hill
as 16-11811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADVANCED DATA PROCESSING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NICOLE HILL
Advanced Data Processing, Inc. v. Hill
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Advanced Data Processing, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicole Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maurikia Lyda, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 15-2236
Debtor:
In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Appellant:
MAURIKIA LYDA, JOHN SMITH, NICOLE HILL and others
Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and DETROIT WATER AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
