Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", XIAO Jewellry Store, DongYuRong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Stratton v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Jarred Stratton
Defendant:
Ramiro Padilla, Anthony Woldring Roberts, Reaper Motors Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Green v. William (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Green
Defendant:
Lara William, BB & T Bank, Region Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00357
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv01870
Plaintiff:
Leslie Nicole Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joseph Pirela v. Angel Miranda
as 16-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL JOSE MIRANDA, LYDIA NICOLE ROBERTS and ETHIEL CALDERON
Joseph Pirela v. Ethiel Calderon, et al
as 16-15225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHIEL CALDERON, ANGEL JOSE MIRANDA, LYDIA NICOLE ROBERTS and others
Joseph Pirela v. Angel Miranda
as 16-1815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL JOSE MIRANDA, LYDIA NICOLE ROBERTS and ETHIEL CALDERON
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 5:2015cv00607
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Jose Miranda, Lydia Nicole Roberts and Ethiel Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
