Cases 1 - 10 of 97
(SS) Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01942
Plaintiff:
Shamika Nicole Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
J. Sutton v. Leonard Townsend, et al
as 26-1311
Defendant:
JUDGE LEONARD TOWNSEND, Deceased, JUDGE SHANNON NICOL WALKER, THEODORE SANDBERG, Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
J. T. SUTTON, aka T. J. Sutton
Willie Benton, Jr. v. City of Akron, OH, et al
as 26-3186
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. BENTON, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AKRON, OH, SUMMIT COUNTY, OH, AKRON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Benton v. City of Akron et al.
as 5:2025cv02676
Plaintiff:
Willie R. Benton, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Akron, Summit County, Ohio, Akron Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Cardello-Smith v. Combs et al
as 2:2025cv11486
Respondent:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Kym L. Worthy and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith #267009 v. Combs et al
as 1:2025cv00571
Respondent:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Kym L. Worthy and others
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00476
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Tarnisha Nicole Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. Hartman
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nicole Walker
Defendant:
J. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
