Cases 1 - 10 of 3,947
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kayla Heidelberg v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HEIDELBERG, Administrator of the Estate of Cleve Heidelberg, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, LARRY BERNARD, EMANUEL MANIAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Ryan
as 24-2529
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAMAR NOLAN RYAN
Nolan v. Mazza
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Timothy Nolan
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Zinan Yang
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Associate irector Connie Nolan and Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
