Cases 1 - 10 of 2,398
Beach v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Deputy Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 3:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Lee County Sheriff's Office, John E. Slaten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borders v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Borders
Defendant:
David Gomez, LT. Norris, LT. Krewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
NORRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williamson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
BRAEDEN WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Overton v. Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
as 7:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Herbert Norris Overton
Defendant:
Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy v. Moore
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Norris R. McCoy
Defendant:
Officer Ronisha Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Lorina Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
