Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00634
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR II and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, NOVO NORDISK INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS d/b/a CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Intervenor:
The Children's Hospital Association, 340B HEALTH, THEAMERICIAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH CARE INC, RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Azar et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert P. Charrow, Thomas J. Engels and others
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HUISHA-HUISHA et al v. GAYNOR et al
as 1:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
H.T.D.S.D.S., H.N.D.S., E.R.P.D.S. and others
Defendant:
PETER T. GAYNOR, ROBERT R. REDFIELD, RODNEY S. SCOTT and others
Amicus Curiae:
DEBORAH ANKER, T. ALEXANDER ALEINIKOFF, HISTORIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
POMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as PIH HEALTH HOSPITAL - WHITTIER also known as PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY - WHITTIER, PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as PIH HEALTH HOSPITAL - DOWNEY also known as DOWNEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as DOWNEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, DOWNEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY FORT WORTH formerly known as PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH, COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY DALLAS, COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTER, LLC doing business as COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTERS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Vista Health Plan v. HHS
as 20-50963
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Seema Verma, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vista Service Corporation and Vista Health Plan, Incorporated
Asapansa-Johnson Walker v. Azar II
as 20-3827
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker and Cecilia Gentili
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
