Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 249
EARLES et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv70504
Defendant: BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: MARY EARLES and HOWARD J. EARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv70505
Defendant: BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, DEERE & CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff: BERTHA COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridgestone Firestone N Amer, et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-30422
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE LLC, Corporate Parents Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc., and Bridgestone Corp. and FIRESTONE POLYMERS LLC, Corporate Partners Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc., Bridgestone Corp., and B F S Diversified Products LLC
Defendant - Appellee: LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO, Corporate Partners Liberty Mutual Holding Co Inc., and Liberty Mutual Group Inc., INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Corporate Partner ACE Ltd. and PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE CO, Corporate Partners Pacific Employers Insurance Co., and ACE Ltd.
: CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS INC
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Lloyd v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv05850
Plaintiff: SHAWN LLOYD, SHAWN LLOYD and SHAWN LLOYD
Defendant: BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC and others
Cross Defendant: NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC., NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC., CHARVON R. DAVIS-PIERCE and others
Third Party Defendant: CHARVON R. DAVIS-PIERCE and CONSTANCE Y. DAVIS
Third Party Plaintiff: NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC., NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC. and CHARVON R. DAVIS-PIERCE
Counter Claimant: CONSTANCE Y. DAVIS
Counter Defendant: NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC. and NEWINS BAY SHORE FORD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
LLOYD v. BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE LLC
as 1:2009cv05850
Plaintiff: SHAWN LLOYD
Defendant: BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Hawkins et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2009cv00130
Plaintiff: Audrey Hawkins and Tonya Girton
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
In Re: Ford Motor Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-50109
Petitioner: In re: FORD MOTOR CO, a Delaware Corporation and BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE LLC, the successor to Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc
Plaintiff - Respondent: ANTONIO GUEVARA MENDOZA, Individually as Surviving Father of Carolina Guevara Rodriguez, Deceased, MARTHA RODRIGUEZ DEL VALLE, Individually as Surviving Mother of Carolina Guevara Rodriguez, Deceased, ROSA VIDRIO CALVO, Individually and others
Parker et al v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv05704
Plaintiff: Peggy Parker, Peggy Parker, Peggy Parker and others
Defendant: Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire LLC and Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Ruiz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv02376
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant: Marcelo Ruiz, Michelle Walsh, MUH Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?