Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Lewis v. Hubert Peterkin
as 23-7020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HUBERT PETERKIN, Sheriff of Hoke County, NACHIA REVELS, Chief Jail Administrator/Hoke County Detention Center, HOKE COUNTY and others
Garrus v. Houser et al
as 4:2021cv01580
Petitioner:
Nakia William Garrus
Respondent:
Morris Houser, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. ACS-Kings County, Division 2 Brooklyn NY et al
as 1:2018cv01798
Defendant:
Richard Sharpe, Nakia Williams, Mrs. El Saieh and others
Plaintiff:
Idzumi S. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DiPede et al v. McFarlane et al
as 1:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
Ryan DiPede and Virginia Jamieson
Defendant:
Josephine McFarlane, Gladys Carrion, Karen McNeely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burnsv. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
Howard Russell Burns, II
Defendant:
Haynes Motor Lines, LLC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Nakia Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
WILLIAMS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv03024
Plaintiff:
NAKIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nakia Garrus v. Barry Johnson, et al
as 09-3586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAKIA WILLIAM GARRUS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY JOHNSON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
GARRUS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv06058
Petitioner:
NAKIA WILLIAM GARRUS
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JEFFERY BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Chrysler LLC
as 08-60725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAKIA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRYSLER LLC and TRW - OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS/MESA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
