Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Smith v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022ct03138
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Lexis Publishing, Nancy S. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Smith v. Jackson Kiser
as 20-7755
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY S. NASH, Attorney, JACKSON L. KISER, U.S. District Judge and LEXIS PUBLISHING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
David Smith v. Jackson Kiser
as 20-6153
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY S. NASH, Attorney, JACKSON L. KISER, U.S. District Judge and LEXIS PUBLISHING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Bethel Ministries, Inc. v. Salmon et al
as 1:2019cv01853
Defendant:
Elizabeth Green, Matthew Gallagher, A. Skipp Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Bethel Ministries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Smith v. Jackson Kiser
as 19-6738
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY S. NASH, Attorney, JACKSON L. KISER, U.S. District Judge and LEXIS PUBLISHING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Francis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01949
Plaintiff:
Nancy S. Francis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Flanagan et al
as 5:2017ct03063
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Louise W. Flanagan, Terrence W. Boyle, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Flanagan et al
as 5:2017ct03052
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Louise W. Flanagan, Terrence W. Boyle, Lexis Publishing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritchey v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01062
Plaintiff:
Nancy S. Ritchey
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Boyle et al
as 5:2016ct03297
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, State of North Carolina, Lexis Publishing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
