Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv05148
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hughes
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and The Harvest Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Williams v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Henry Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Gary Musslewhite, Rob Perice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Byrnes et al
as 5:2022cv05039
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
Officer Andrew Byrnes, Officer Phillip Crosby, Officer Page Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northcutt et al v. Berhe et al
as 5:2021cv05178
Plaintiff:
Curtis Northcutt and Natalie Northcutt
Defendant:
Yosef T. Berhe, Biserat Zegai and Weichert Workforce Mobility Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Albers v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Natalie N Albers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Porter v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Does Unknown Officials, Dewayne Hendrix, Andrew Cruzan and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Dewayne Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Strode
as 4:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Wynona D Smith
Defendant:
Natalie Strode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman et al v. City of Walnut Ridge, et al
as 3:2018cv00230
Defendant:
Walnut Ridge Arkansas, City of and Chris Kirksey
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hyman and William Whitfield Hyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman v. City of Walnut Ridge, et al
as 2:2018cv02138
Defendant:
The City of Walnut Ridge and Chris Kirksey
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hyman and William Whitfield Hyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
