Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Brock v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03149
Plaintiff:
Steven Brock , Latanya Brown , Rosa Buchanan and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Brock v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv03149
Plaintiff:
Steven Brock , Latanya Brown , Rosa Buchanan and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Brown v. Yelich et al
as 9:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brown
Defendant:
B. Yelich, Albert Prack, D. Phelix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Brown
as 13-1706
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nathan Brown
United States of America v. Brown
as 12-3788
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nathan Brown, Richard Ross, Jr. and Tommy Hardy, AKA Wody
Defendant - Appellant:
Chad Marks
Brown v. Quality Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00443
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brown
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Healthcare, Inc. , Jerry Gurley , Johnney Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 3:2012cv00272
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Brown
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bailey and Michael Laboo
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 3:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Brown
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bailey and Michael Laboo
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
