Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07003
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Roger
as 23-10816
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Nathan Roger
Rogers v. Petersen et al
as 3:2023cv03281
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rogers
Defendant:
Conor Petersen and Thunkspace, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Burton et al v. Martinson et al
as 5:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Xavier Burton and Douglas Martinson, II
Defendant:
The City of Huntsville, Nicholas Light and Nathan Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company v. Rogers et al
as 1:2020cv01295
Defendant:
Nathan Rogers, Jessica Dodge as PNG of "G.B." an Infant and Jessica Dodge
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman et al v. Schlumberger Tech. Corp.
as 4:2020cv00785
Plaintiff:
Brad Hill, Wesley Goodman, Nathan Rogers and others
Defendant:
Schlumberger Tech. Corp.
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03208
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv09482
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROGERS and JESSICA CRADDUCK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv03156
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rogers and Jessica Cradduck
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc and Imerys Talc America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Craig, Wesley Waldrop, John Phillip Werner and others
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (TV2) and Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
