Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hale v. Morrilton, City of et al
as 4:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Quentin Hale
Defendant:
Morrilton, City of and Nathan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahomes v. Watkins et al
as 4:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Lawrance Mahomes and Lawrance D Mahomes
Defendant:
Nathan Watkins, Brenda Gilliam and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krishonn Cooney v. Taylor Dubbie, et al
as 22-1480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant / Appellee:
Taylor Dubbie, Morrilton Police Department and Nathan Watkins, Morrilton Police Department
Krishonn Cooney v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-3824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, Taylor Doobie, Officer, Morrilton Police Department, Nathan Watkins, Officer, Morrilton Police Department and others
Cooney v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Taylor Doobie, Nathan Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Watkins et al
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Earl Ferguson, Jr
Defendant:
Nathan Watkins, Morrilton Arkansas, City of and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahomes v. Watkins et al
as 4:2015cv00546
Plaintiff:
Lawrance D Mahomes
Defendant:
Nathan Watkins, Rusty Quinn, Norbert Gunderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahomes v. Quinn et al
as 4:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mahomes
Defendant:
Rusty Quinn, Norbert Gunderman, Nathan Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Watkins
as 4:2012cv00380
Plaintiff:
Karl Sinon Thomas
Defendant:
Nathan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisler et al v. Daff et al
as 1:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paula Sisler, James Rogers, Nicole Rogers and others
Defendant:
Timothy Daff, Timothy Daff, City of Reedsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
