Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spencer v. KK et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Spencer
Defendant:
Shoei Kisen KK and Pedregal Maritime/Takumi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
SPENCER v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv00843
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and MS. MASON
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL SPENCER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42594
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SPENCER LYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Maria Dugon et al v. LAC/USC Healthcare Network et al
as 2:2014cv08305
Defendant:
California Hospital Medical Center, Clinica MSR. Oscar A. Romero, Salandan Danilo, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Dugon and Maria Dugon
Swift v. Western Mental Health Institute et al
as 1:2014cv01195
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Swift
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute, Haywood County Justice Complex, D. Nathaniel Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Dugon et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv05517
Defendant:
California Hospital Medical Center, Clinica MSR. Oscar A. Romero, Salandan Danilo and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Dugon and Maria Dugon
Spencer et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28485
Plaintiff:
Selena Spencer and Nathaniel Spencer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Dugon et al v. LAC/USC Healthcare Network et al
as 2:2013cv06721
Defendant:
California Hospital Medical Center, Clinica MSR. Oscar A. Romero, Salandian Danilo and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Dugon and Maria Dugon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
