Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hicks v. Director of Navos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01243
Plaintiff: Ronnie L Hicks
Defendant: Director of Navos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SANDY SHORES RESORT MOTEL, INC.
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff: Elijah, a minor Navo and EBONY WILLIAMS
Defendant: SANDY SHORES RESORT MOTEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shellef et al v. RPCK Rastegar Panchal, P.C. et al
as 4:2020cv00663
Defendant: Joshua Teitelbaum, Chintan Panchal, Jeremy Saks and others
Plaintiff: WE Group Naturals, LLC and Edo Shellef
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv01169
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2016cv00286
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fulton v. Navos
as 2:2012cv00352
Plaintiff: Edward L Fulton
Defendant: Navos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fulton v. Navos
as 2:2012cv00350
Plaintiff: Edward L Fulton
Defendant: Navos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Navos,et al v. Mental Health Risk Retention Group We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00262
Defendant: Mental Health Risk Retention Group
Plaintiff: Navos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011hc02028
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?