Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,377
Negrete-Neal v. Luraschi et al
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff: Rheta Negrete-Neal
Defendant: Anthony Luraschi, Apperson Crump, PLC, Timothy Ginski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Owens et al v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff: Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant: Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sakon v. Johnson
as 24-1747
Plaintiff: JOHN ALAN SAKON
Defendant: JOHN JOHNSON, F. PERRONE, BRUCE D. SKEHAN and others
McKennon et al v. LoanCare LLC
as 4:2024cv01535
Plaintiff: Jodi McKennon and Neal McKennon
Defendant: LoanCare LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Neal, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff: Harvey Neal, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant: National Liability & Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Walter White, Jr. v. Ron Neal
as 24-1690
Petitioner: WALTER B. WHITE, JR.
Respondent: RON NEAL
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff: Demond Williams
Defendant: Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02998
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02999
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?