Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Beaman v. Bunn Commercial, LP
as 1:2026cv08787
Plaintiff:
Nellie Beaman
Defendant:
Bunn Commercial, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04175
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ALTMAN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04609
Plaintiff:
NELLIE ALTMAN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bebeaux v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01564
Plaintiff:
Nellie J. Bebeaux
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Aulen v. Ginza 2 LLC
as 1:2026cv05561
Plaintiff:
Nelli Aulen
Defendant:
Ginza 2 LLC doing business as Mari Vanna Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Torres Oquendo et al v. Doctors' Center Hospital Bayamn, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01387
Plaintiff:
Nelly Torres Oquendo and Yarelis Torres
Defendant:
Doctors' Center Hospital Bayamn, Inc., Norbert Correa Sardina, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Bu Madrid v. Blanche
as 26-60445
Petitioner:
Nelly Angelina Bu Madrid
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
