Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Burnley v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Margarita Lozoda Valentine, Jeffrey W Walburn, Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
John Newbill v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Newbill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCBRIDE v. U.S.A. LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
KATHY MCBRIDE
Defendant:
U.S.A. LOGISTICS, INC., LEWIS T NEWBILL and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Newbill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04774
Plaintiff:
Maureen Newbill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen Poston v. Director Kane
as 13-7805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KANE, Director, TRACY JONES, Warden, ERIC WILSON, Warden and others
Poston v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Kane, Tracy Jones, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Newbill v. US
as 10-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A. NEWBILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Newbill v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Newbill
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
