Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Barrs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2021cv02535
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Barrs
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and H & M International Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert Ragan
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Adam L Hill
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hill v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wyatt v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beasley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seal v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00462
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Douglas D Seal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Hub Group Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02108
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, John Doe, Hub Group Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Rowland v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00530
Plaintiff:
Austin Rowland
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Shaw v. H&M International Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02629
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and H&M International Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
