Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 208
James Nottingham v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 22-3304
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nottingham v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00742
Petitioner: Rakim Nottingham
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01398
Plaintiff: Kenneth Gray
Defendant: John Baldwin, Ryan Nottingham, Teri A Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOTTINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13364
Plaintiff: BRANDON LEE NOTTINGHAM
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff: Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nottingham v. Social Security
as 1:2022cv03868
Plaintiff: Michelle D Nottingham
Defendant: Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00815
Plaintiff: Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00815
Plaintiff: Monroe, Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Nottingham v. Miele We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00330
Plaintiff: James E. Nottingham
Defendant: William Miele, Lycoming County Public Defenders, Timothy Reitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nottingham v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv00317
Plaintiff: James Nottingham
Defendant: Williams and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?