Cases 21 - 30 of 2,582
Ochoa Contreras, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1407
Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL OCHOA CONTRERAS, VICTORIA FLORES PALACIOS and JAMIE JAMES OCHOA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Jose Alvarado Ochoa
as 24-4132
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE EMILIO ALVARADO OCHOA
Glafiro Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Glafiro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Warden USP Lompoc, Assistant Warden USP Lompoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Alfredo Ochoa
as 24-1415
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alfredo Ochoa
Guevara et al v. Aaron Electric Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Maria N. Roque Guevara, Elsy Bermudez Amaya, Jose R. Bonilla Ochoa and others
Other:
Aaron Electric Inc. and Pablo A. Portillo Argueta
Cross Defendant:
Integrated Design Build, Inc.
Defendant:
Power Design, Inc., L.F. Jennings, Inc., David E. Harvey Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Labor Standards Act
Toapanta Ochoa v. Garland
as 24-456
Petitioner:
JEFFERSON JHONNY TOAPANTA OCHOA, ERIKA TATIANA ACAN GUAMUNSHI and KEYNER ISAAC TOAPANTA ACAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company v. Ochoa Leal et al
as 1:2024cv20760
Plaintiff:
Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Luis Ernesto Ochoa Leal, Luis Manuel Gonzalez and Virgina Higgins Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Padilla Ochoa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1005
Petitioner:
EDWIN ALEXANDER PADILLA OCHOA, ERIKA FAVIOLA BERMUDEZ CRUZ, KENDALL MAYBETH PADILLA BERMUDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
