Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Sims v. ODonnell et al
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Shanitra Sims
Defendant:
Timothy Michael ODonnell, Amistad Freight Inc. and Amistad Freight Lines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jenkins v. Tahmahkera et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Shanelle Jenkins
Defendant:
Michael Tahmahkera, Jordan Beene, Jason Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORENO v. ODONNELL
as 4:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
MICAH MORENO
Defendant:
LISA ODONNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, The Hopkinsville Police Dept and B. ODonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pearson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
David A Pearson, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Christopher Stevens, C ODonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODONNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17719
Plaintiff:
JOHN ODONNELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lifschitz v. CIRCOR International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06949
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifschitz
Defendant:
CIRCOR International, Inc., Samuel R. Chapin, Tina M. Donikowski and others
Forester-Hoare v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Mary Moore, Meli, Dr Manlove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01876
Defendant:
JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL, STEVEN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
