Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hopper v. Sherrell et al
as 2:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
Billy Hopper and Billy Hooper
Defendant:
David Sherrell and Officer Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nirin Walls v. Brett Wells, et al
as 23-2483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIRIN WALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRETT WELLS, CCII Grievance Handler, TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, CAO Warden, NURSE HEFFELFINGER, Dixon Correctional Center and others
Scott v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01015
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott
Defendant:
Lt. Williams, Officer Whitfield, Officer Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Lynch v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv07931
Plaintiff:
Kelly LYNCH
Defendant:
%2340423 Officer%20Wall, %2342917 Sergeant%20Lankford, CITY%20OF%20LOS%20ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CORSO v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2018cv00669
Defendant:
OFFICER WALL, OFFICER TORENCE, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY and others
Plaintiff:
LELAND CORSO
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Stocker v. Bateman et al
as 8:2018cv00428
Petitioner:
Michael David Stocker
Respondent:
Officer Bateman, Officer Walls and Lake County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stocker v. Bateman et al
as 5:2018cv00096
Petitioner:
Michael David Stocker
Respondent:
Officer Bateman and Officer Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald McClary v. Lieutenant Crosson
as 17-7323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CROSSON, OFFICER WILLIAMS, OFFICER HICKS and others
Ronald McClary v. Lieutenant Crosson
as 16-7175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CROSSON, OFFICER WILLIAMS, OFFICER HICKS and others
Bobby Ray Grady v. Fane Greenfield
as 16-6898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY RAY GRADY
Defendant - Appellee:
FANE GREENFIELD, OFFICER MARTINEZ, OFFICER WALLS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
