Cases 11 - 20 of 262
Rodriguez v. Upfield US Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02223
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Upfield US Inc., Brennen Jensen and Rayna Farrar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Judge Orlando Rodriguez, Ex-Judge Romero Molina, Craig Stephen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Flores, et al v. US Government, et al
as 22-1039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES and ALICIA AYBAR-ROSADO
Defendant / Appellee:
US GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Batista Rodriguez et al v. Electronic Deals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03110
Defendant:
Guy J. Esses, S & V Trading of NY, Ltd., Vovoya, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jordannis Cosme Batista, Jarmirian Batista Rodriguez, Olga Jaime and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Torres
as 21-50426
Defendant / Appellant:
Orlando Rodriguez Torres
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
OJO v. CORECIVIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv11362
Defendant:
CORECIVIC, INC., ERIKA GONZALEZ, SANDRA TUTLER and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 6:2021cv06301
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Olukayode David Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08377
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03290
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
