Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Overton v. United States of America
as 26-1742
Petitioner:
MARKEL OVERTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Overton v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 2:2026cv06735
Plaintiff:
Tuwanna Overton
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Overton v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06938
Plaintiff:
Twanda Overton
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Overton v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2026cv01346
Plaintiff:
Warren Eugene Overton
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Oklahoma County and City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Overton-Bey v. Twin Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03161
Plaintiff:
JH Overton-Bey
Defendant:
Twin Hospitality Group, Inc., FAT Brands, Inc,, La LACIMA Restaurants, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Ostrander et al
as 2:2026cv04038
Plaintiff:
Nikiah Ethel Newton
Defendant:
Unknown Ostrander, Unknown Overton and Gerard A Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Overton
as 5:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
Montrial Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Bail et al
as 2:2026cv04109
Plaintiff:
Franklin E Evans, Jr
Defendant:
Keith Michael Bail, R Paul Beard, Eric Benjamin Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Watford et al
as 2:2026cv00746
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden, MD
Defendant:
Ernest Deandre Watford, IV, Kardareous Monteniz Gillis, Lisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Overton v. Warden
as 2:2026cv01684
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
