Cases 11 - 20 of 5,282
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Secretary Department Of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Jesse Owens
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Peachtree City P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Terell Owens
Defendant:
Peachtree City P.D. and Fayette County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. White
as 3:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Schuylkill County Prison
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Owen James Kelley
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pablo-Rodas v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Pablo-Rodas
Defendant:
Erin Reyes and R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05272
Petitioner:
Bryan Michael Owens
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDERSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
KHALID ANDERSON
Defendant:
TERRA, JENKINS and K OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Hindman v. John Doe, et al
as 24-5311
Plaintiff:
JIMMY DOYLE HINDMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Unknown Federal Prison Guard in Memphis, TN, ANGELA M. OWENS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
