Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hans Niemann v. Sven Carlsen, et al
as 23-2717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hans Moke Niemann
Defendant / Appellee:
Sven Magnus Oen Carlsen, also known as Magnus Carlsen, Play Magnus AS, doing business as Play Magnus Group, Chess.com, LLC and others
Hans Niemann v. Sven Carlsen, et al
as 23-2216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hans Moke Niemann
Defendant / Appellee:
Sven Magnus Oen Carlsen, also known as Magnus Carlsen, Play Magnus AS, doing business as Play Magnus Group, Chess.com, LLC and others
Niemann v. Carlsen et al
as 4:2022cv01110
Defendant:
Sven Magnus en Carlsen, Daniel Rensch, Magnus Carlsen and others
Plaintiff:
Hans Moke Niemann
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oen v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv07111
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Oen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirksey v. Kenosha County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv01310
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Oenning, Kenosha County Detention Center, Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauerhan v. FlyDive et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Camille Mauerhan
Defendant:
FlyDive , K'lene Oen and Christos Nicolaidis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oenning v. Harris
as 3:2014cv02781
Petitioner:
Shane Michael Oenning
Respondent:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oenning v. Harris et al
as 4:2014cv00263
Petitioner:
Shane Michael Oenning
Respondent:
Kamala Harris and Greg Munks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tjong v. Miso, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01293
Plaintiff:
Oen Yung Tjong
Defendant:
Miso, Inc. and Chin Ming Lau
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
