Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Byner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Officer Simmons, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Dionntez Byner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Henderson et al
as 3:2019cv00660
Plaintiff:
Sidney Harris
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Jeffery Dennison, Shawn Brasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturghill v. Shelby County Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02364
Defendant:
Officer Vance, SGT Boyd, T. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Sturghill, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Scheland, Nurse Rhonda and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Newton et al
as 1:2018cv00851
Defendant:
Cpl. Rideout, Chaplin Joe Collins, Officer Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERILIEN v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2018cv00239
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, UNIT MANAGER ROZIER, UNIT MANAGER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03111
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Johnson, Sgt. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yassi v. Officer J. Hardemon et al
as 8:2017cv02468
Plaintiff:
Lamine Mamadou Yassi
Defendant:
Officer J. Hardemon, Officer Bryant, Officer W. Pyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
