Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Ohm v. Dupree et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Stan Ohm
Defendant:
Randy H Dupree, Christopher J. Regan and Brett McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Ohm
as 24-1497
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HECTOR OHM
Kaeun Kim v. Mark Ali, et al
as 24-1448
Plaintiff:
KAEUN KIM
Defendant:
MARK ALI, MIRA OHM, ROBERT BUHRMEISTER and others
Varner et al v. CPS/CCDFS et al
as 2:2024cv00341
Defendant:
Teresa Tibbs, CPS/CCDFS, Bobbie and others
Plaintiff:
Khari Varner, Tera Strawter, K.L.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC, Ramada Worldwide Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
OHM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14866
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OHM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OHM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
JASON OHM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIM v. ALI et al
as 2:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
KAEUN KIM
Defendant:
MARK ALI, MIRA OHM, ROBERT BUHRMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jae Lee v. Agape Health Management, Inc.
as 23-1636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAE MIN LEE, KYONG SIM CHE, MYEONG SUK CHOI and others
Plaintiff:
HYE YOUNG SON
Defendant / Appellee:
AGAPE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., DONG CHUL CHOI, SUN OK LEE and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL H. RYU and RYU & RYU, PLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
