Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Nicole Mizrahi v. National Board of Examiner
as 17-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLE MIZRAHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Mizrahi v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03146
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mizrahi
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hutton et al v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03025
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Hutton, O.D. and Tawny P. Kaeochinda, O.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Sutphin Optometry, P.C. et al
as 1:2014cv06624
Defendant:
Farshad Haiimpour and Sutphin Optometry, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc. v. Lee
as 1:2014cv07906
Plaintiff:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven P Lee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
VanDiver v. Prison Health Services, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv11236
Plaintiff:
Jerry VanDiver
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc, John Steele, Badawi Abdellatif and others
Tyler Eye Care, P.A. et al v. Conrey et al
as 6:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tyler Eye Care, P.A. , Tyler Hearing, LLC , Neshia R. Rudd and others
Defendant:
Brad Conrey , Brian Conrey , Teresa Conrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
